|Eingestellt in Kategorie:
Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?

Rationalität übernehmen: Wie Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse die Umwelt besser schützen kann

Artikelzustand:
Neu
Preis:
US $24,99
Ca.CHF 22,25
Versand:
Kostenlos Sparversand. Weitere Detailsfür Versand
Standort: Wesley Chapel, Florida, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Fr, 21. Jun und Di, 25. Jun nach 43230 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Wir wenden ein spezielles Verfahren zur Einschätzung des Liefertermins an – in diese Schätzung fließen Faktoren wie die Entfernung des Käufers zum Artikelstandort, der gewählte Versandservice, die bisher versandten Artikel des Verkäufers und weitere ein. Insbesondere während saisonaler Spitzenzeiten können die Lieferzeiten abweichen.
Rücknahmen:
14 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Weitere Details- Informationen zu Rückgaben
Zahlungen:
     

Sicher einkaufen

eBay-Käuferschutz
Geld zurück, wenn etwas mit diesem Artikel nicht stimmt. 

Angaben zum Verkäufer

Angemeldet als privater Verkäufer; verbraucherschützende Vorschriften, die sich aus dem EU-Verbraucherrecht ergeben, finden daher keine Anwendung. Der eBay-Käuferschutz gilt dennoch für die meisten Käufe.
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:114323497047
Zuletzt aktualisiert am 26. Aug. 2021 14:39:49 MESZAlle Änderungen ansehenAlle Änderungen ansehen

Artikelmerkmale

Artikelzustand
Neu: Neues, ungelesenes, ungebrauchtes Buch in makellosem Zustand ohne fehlende oder beschädigte ...
Subject
Commercial / General, Environmental, Public Affairs & Administration, Health, General
ISBN-13
9780199768950
ISBN
9780199768950
EAN
9780199768950
Subject Area
Law, Political Science
Publication Name
Retaking Rationality : How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
Item Length
6.1 in
Publication Year
2011
Type
Textbook
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Item Height
0.6 in
Author
Michael A. Livermore, Richard L. Revesz
Item Weight
13.1 Oz
Item Width
9.2 in
Number of Pages
264 Pages

Über dieses Produkt

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0199768951
ISBN-13
9780199768950
eBay Product ID (ePID)
92524423

Product Key Features

Number of Pages
264 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Retaking Rationality : How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health
Subject
Commercial / General, Environmental, Public Affairs & Administration, Health, General
Publication Year
2011
Type
Textbook
Author
Michael A. Livermore, Richard L. Revesz
Subject Area
Law, Political Science
Format
Trade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height
0.6 in
Item Weight
13.1 Oz
Item Length
6.1 in
Item Width
9.2 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Reviews
"For anyone interested in how good public policy should be made in Washington, reading Retaking Rationality is the place to start. It is a well-reasoned, carefully documented, and well-written book." --Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Chief Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law and former Board Chair, Natural Resources Defense Council"The application of cost-benefit analysis to environmental regulation is widely believed to have an inherent conservative bias. As Revesz and Livermore show in compelling detail, this is wrong. Cost-benefit analysis is simply a disciplined method of rationally assessing the consequences of proposed courses of action." --Richard Posner, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and author of Economic Analysis of Law (7th ed. 2007)"Revesz and Livermore provide a thoughtful and compelling analysis of how cost-benefit analysis can and should be used to further the public good." --Richard A. Meserve, President of the Carnegie Institution of Washington and former Chairman, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "For anyone interested in how good public policy should be made in Washington, reading Retaking Rationality is the place to start. It is a well-reasoned, carefully documented, and well-written book." --Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Chief Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law and former Board Chair, Natural Resources Defense Council "The application of cost-benefit analysis to environmental regulation is widely believed to have an inherent conservative bias. As Revesz and Livermore show in compelling detail, this is wrong. Cost-benefit analysis is simply a disciplined method of rationally assessing the consequences of proposed courses of action." --Richard Posner, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and author of Economic Analysis of Law (7th ed. 2007) "Revesz and Livermore provide a thoughtful and compelling analysis of how cost-benefit analysis can and should be used to further the public good." --Richard A. Meserve, President of the Carnegie Institution of Washington and former Chairman, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Dewey Edition
22
Number of Volumes
1 vol.
Dewey Decimal
320.60973
Table Of Content
Prologue: Compassion and ReasonPart I: Decisions Are Made By Those Who Show UpThe Case for Cost-Benefit AnalysisBeyond Tragic ChoicesThe Walls Go UpMissed OpportunitiesWinning the Good Fight (Sometimes)Part II: Eight Fallacies in Cost-Benefit AnalysisFallacy 1: All Unintended Consequences Are BadFallacy 2: Wealth Equals HealthFallacy 3: Older People Are Less ValuableFallacy 4: People Can't AdaptFallacy 5: People Always Want to Put Off Bad ThingsFallacy 6: We Are Worth More than Our ChildrenFallacy 7: People Value Only What They UseFallacy 8: Industry Can't AdaptPart III: Instituting Regulatory RationalityJumping Through HoopsShaky FoundationRethinking OIRABalancing The ScalesEpilogue: Self-Fulfilling PropheciesAcknowledgements
Synopsis
Written in a clear and non-technical manner, Retaking Rationality gives progressive groups and the public the tools they need both to understand and to engage in the debate over the economic analysis of environmental, public health, and safety regulation. Since the Reagan presidency, the most important regulations affecting every American have been required to pass a "cost-benefit " test, but most Americans-including many professionals working for progressive institutions or elected officials-do not understand how economic analysis works. The result is that industry and conservative ideologues have twisted economic analysis so that good regulations seem to fail the cost-benefit test. This book argues that the public, and progressive institutions, must take up the fight over how economic analysis is conducted, and gives them the knowledge they need to engage industry and conservatives about when and how economic analysis of regulation should be carried out., That America's natural environment has been degraded and despoiled over the past 25 years is beyond dispute. Nor has there been any shortage of reasons why-short-sighted politicians, a society built on over-consumption, and the dramatic weakening of environmental regulations. In Retaking Rationality , Richard L. Revesz and Michael A. Livermore argue convincingly that one of the least understood-and most important-causes of our failure to protect the environment has been a misguided rejection of reason. The authors show that environmentalists, labor unions, and other progressive groups have declined to participate in the key governmental proceedings concerning the cost-benefit analysis of federal regulations. As a result of this vacuum, industry groups have captured cost-benefit analysis and used it to further their anti-regulatory ends. Beginning in 1981, the federal Office of Management and Budget and the federal courts have used cost-benefit analysis extensively to determine which environmental, health, and safety regulations are approved and which are sent back to the drawing board. The resulting imbalance in political participation has profoundly affected the nation's regulatory and legal landscape. But Revesz and Livermore contend that economic analysis of regulations is necessary and that it needn't conflict with-and can in fact support-a more compassionate approach to environmental policy. Indeed, they show that we cannot give up on rationality if we truly want to protect our natural environment. Retaking Rationality makes clear that by embracing and reforming cost-benefit analysis, and by joining reason and compassion, progressive groups can help enact strong environmental and public health regulation., That America's natural environment has been degraded and despoiled over the past 25 years is beyond dispute. Nor has there been any shortage of reasons why-short-sighted politicians, a society built on over-consumption, and the dramatic weakening of environmental regulations. In Retaking Rationality, Richard L. Revesz and Michael A. Livermore argue convincingly that one of the least understood-and most important-causes of our failure to protect the environment has been a misguided rejection of reason. The authors show that environmentalists, labor unions, and other progressive groups have declined to participate in the key governmental proceedings concerning the cost-benefit analysis of federal regulations. As a result of this vacuum, industry groups have captured cost-benefit analysis and used it to further their anti-regulatory ends. Beginning in 1981, the federal Office of Management and Budget and the federal courts have used cost-benefit analysis extensively to determine which environmental, health, and safety regulations are approved and which are sent back to the drawing board. The resulting imbalance in political participation has profoundly affected the nation's regulatory and legal landscape. But Revesz and Livermore contend that economic analysis of regulations is necessary and that it needn't conflict with - and can in fact support - a more compassionate approach to environmental policy. Indeed, they show that we cannot give up on rationality if we truly want to protect our natural environment. Retaking Rationality makes clear that by embracing and reforming cost-benefit analysis, and by joining reason and compassion, progressive groups can help enact strong environmental and public health regulation., That America's natural environment has been degraded and despoiled over the past 25 years is beyond dispute. Nor has there been any shortage of reasons why-short-sighted politicians, a society built on over-consumption, and the dramatic weakening of environmental regulations. In Retaking Rationality, Richard L. Revesz and Michael A. Livermore argue convincingly that one of the least understood-and most important-causes of our failure to protect the environment has been a misguided rejection of reason. The authors show that environmentalists, labor unions, and other progressive groups have declined to participate in the key governmental proceedings concerning the cost-benefit analysis of federal regulations. As a result of this vacuum, industry groups have captured cost-benefit analysis and used it to further their anti-regulatory ends. Beginning in 1981, the federal Office of Management and Budget and the federal courts have used cost-benefit analysis extensively to determine which environmental, health, and safety regulations are approved and which are sent back to the drawing board. The resulting imbalance in political participation has profoundly affected the nation's regulatory and legal landscape. But Revesz and Livermore contend that economic analysis of regulations is necessary and that it needn't conflict with-and can in fact support-a more compassionate approach to environmental policy. Indeed, they show that we cannot give up on rationality if we truly want to protect our natural environment. Retaking Rationality makes clear that by embracing and reforming cost-benefit analysis, and by joining reason and compassion, progressive groups can help enact strong environmental and public health regulation.
ebay_catalog_id
4

Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers

urge2purge

urge2purge

100% positive Bewertungen
1.3 Tsd. Artikel verkauft
Antwortet meist innerhalb 24 Stunden
Angemeldet als privater Verkäufer
Daher finden verbraucherschützende Vorschriften, die sich aus dem EU-Verbraucherrecht ergeben, keine Anwendung. Der eBay-Käuferschutz gilt dennoch für die meisten Käufe.

Verkäuferbewertungen (542)

m***m (3007)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Super cute. I took it apart and filled it full of stuffing. Looks great hanging in the tike bar. Thanks!
c***t (204)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Love it! Packaged very well
5***5 (3359)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
So cute thanks