Der erste Verfassungszusatz in interkultureller Perspektive Eine vergleichende Rechtsanalyse

2ndChapter Treasures
(1911)
Angemeldet als privater Verkäufer
Verbraucherschützende Vorschriften, die sich aus dem EU-Verbraucherrecht ergeben, finden daher keine Anwendung. Der eBay-Käuferschutz gilt dennoch für die meisten Käufe.
Mehr Artikel des Verkäufers
Verkäufer kontaktieren
US $45,30
Ca.CHF 36,14
oder Preisvorschlag
Artikelzustand:
Neuwertig
Ganz entspannt. Kostenloser Rückversand.
Abholung:
Kostenlose Abholung in Queensbury, New York, USA.
Versand:
US $5,63 (ca. CHF 4,49) Standard Shipping.
Standort: Queensbury, New York, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Di, 7. Okt und Fr, 10. Okt nach 94104 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Liefertermine - wird in neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet berücksichtigen die Bearbeitungszeit des Verkäufers, die PLZ des Artikelstandorts und des Zielorts sowie den Annahmezeitpunkt und sind abhängig vom gewählten Versandservice und dem ZahlungseingangZahlungseingang - wird ein neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet. Insbesondere während saisonaler Spitzenzeiten können die Lieferzeiten abweichen.
Rücknahme:
30 Tage Rückgabe. Verkäufer zahlt Rückversand.
Zahlungen:
     Diners Club

Sicher einkaufen

eBay-Käuferschutz
Geld zurück, wenn etwas mit diesem Artikel nicht stimmt. Mehr erfahreneBay-Käuferschutz - wird in neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:157351656353

Artikelmerkmale

Artikelzustand
Neuwertig: Buch, das wie neu aussieht, aber bereits gelesen wurde. Der Einband weist keine ...
ISBN
9780814747872
Kategorie

Über dieses Produkt

Product Identifiers

Publisher
New York University Press
ISBN-10
0814747876
ISBN-13
9780814747872
eBay Product ID (ePID)
51259052

Product Key Features

Number of Pages
336 Pages
Publication Name
First Amendment in Cross-Cultural Perspective : A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Freedom of Speech
Language
English
Subject
Constitutional, Civil Rights, Constitutions
Publication Year
2006
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Law, Political Science
Author
Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
Series
Critical America Ser.
Format
Hardcover

Dimensions

Item Height
0.6 in
Item Weight
20 Oz
Item Length
9 in
Item Width
6 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
2005-037478
TitleLeading
The
Reviews
" The Free and Open Press ought to be required reading whenever anyone questions the meaning of the Founding Fathers, the framers of the Constitution, or other early American icons of liberty." - Journalism History, "Robert W. T. Martin revitalizes a debate over the status of press rights in eighteenth-century America that had grown tiresome over the past 20 years...all scholars of American political thought and constitutional development should read this book." - American Political Science Review, "Robert Martin has thrown a brilliant spotlight on the field of press liberty and lit up vast areas of democratic theory and practice once obscured. Looking at the century and a half leading up to the American Revolutionary era, he reminds us how decisively it shaped the vast domain of modern liberty." - Joyce Appleby, author of Inheriting the Revolution: the First Generation of Americans, "The uniquely American sense of freedom that makes the First Amendment so beloved and so respected in its homeland is precisely what makes it a difficult model for constitutional protection of expression in other political systems. In this survey of free speech policies in Canada, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Krotosyznski introduces American students and scholars of constitutional law to a diverse range of culturally contingent approaches to protecting the freedom of expression in other industrialized countries. . . . As Krotosyznski's fascinating project demonstrates, comparative constitutional analysis challenges us as Americans to examine critically the cultural assumptions underlying our legal system." - -Jim Chen, University of Minnesota Law School, "An important contribution in support of constitutional exceptionalism. . . . The great gift of Krotoszynski's book is to turn our attention to a knottier subject on which there is far less consensus." - Michigan Law Review, "Martin uses a number of fresh quotations and a helpful arranging and packaging of many ideas on a momentous topic." - American Historical Review, The uniquely American sense of freedom that makes the First Amendment so beloved and so respected in its homeland is precisely what makes it a difficult model for constitutional protection of expression in other political systems. In this survey of free speech policies in Canada, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Krotosyznski introduces American students and scholars of constitutional law to a diverse range of culturally contingent approaches to protecting the freedom of expression in other industrialized countries. . . . As Krotosyznskis fascinating project demonstrates, comparative constitutional analysis challenges us as Americans to examine critically the cultural assumptions underlying our legal system., There are very few scholars who are willing to read as widely in the law of the world as Krotoszynski, and very few who are capable of forming such confident and intelligent judgments., "Suggests that First Amendment scholars might find it useful to consider how other nations, committed to democratic government, have sought to resolve the constant tension between protecting speech while also securing equality." - New York Law Journal ,, "Krotoszynski's conclusions are revealing and forcefully presented. This is especially so when they are based on the author's sophisticated and copiously documented comparison of the U.S. with four advanced legal systems committed to participatory politics. The book undoubtedly challenges many of us who smugly accept American 'exceptionalism' in freedom of speech and the press. . . . Krotoszynski helps us appreciate the value of comparative free speech with a new, penetrating perspective." - Law and Politics Book Review ,, In this survey of free speech policies in Canada, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Krotosyznski introduces American students and scholars of constitutional law to a diverse range of culturally contigent approaches to protecting the freedom of expression in other industrialized countries....As Krotosyznski's fascinating project demonstrates, comparative constitutional analysis challenges us as Americans to examine critically the cultural assumptions underlying our legal system., "There are very few scholars who are willing to read as widely in the law of the world as Krotoszynski, and very few who are capable of forming such confident and intelligent judgments." - -James Whitman, Yale Law School, "Krotoszynski's conclusions are revealing and forcefully presented. This is especially so when they are based on the author's sophisticated and copiously documented comparison of the U.S. with four advanced legal systems committed to participatory politics. The book undoubtedly challenges many of us who smugly accept American 'exceptionalism' in freedom of speech and the press. . . . Krotoszynski helps us appreciate the value of comparative free speech with a new, penetrating perspective." - -Law and Politics Book Review, "Suggests that First Amendment scholars might find it useful to consider how other nations, committed to democratic government, have sought to resolve the constant tension between protecting speech while also securing equality." - -New York Law Journal, Suggests that First Amendment scholars might find it useful to consider how other nations, committed to democratic government, have sought to resolve the constant tension between protecting speech while also securing equality., "Robert Martin's The Free and Open Press is conceptual history at its most illuminating. Recognizing that human beings live via ideas that can seem to work together in one context and to be in contradiction in others, Martin shows that many early Americans believed in both a press that would help republican government work and one in which all views could be heard. The lesson they learnedthat those goals were often in profound tensionis, soberingly, one that remains true today. If that tension is to be eased, the answers must be found not only in the quantity of our rights but in the quality of our citizens." - Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, An important contribution in support of constitutional exceptionalism. . . . The great gift of Krotoszynski's book is to turn our attention to a knottier subject on which there is far less consensus., An important contribution in support of constitutional exceptionalism. . . . The great gift of Krotoszynskis book is to turn our attention to a knottier subject on which there is far less consensus., "The uniquely American sense of freedom that makes the First Amendment so beloved and so respected in its homeland is precisely what makes it a difficult model for constitutional protection of expression in other political systems. In this survey of free speech policies in Canada, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Krotosyznski introduces American students and scholars of constitutional law to a diverse range of culturally contingent approaches to protecting the freedom of expression in other industrialized countries. . . . As Krotosyznski's fascinating project demonstrates, comparative constitutional analysis challenges us as Americans to examine critically the cultural assumptions underlying our legal system." -Jim Chen,University of Minnesota Law School, "An important contribution in support of constitutional exceptionalism. . . . The great gift of Krotoszynski's book is to turn our attention to a knottier subject on which there is far less consensus." - -Michigan Law Review, "There are very few scholars who are willing to read as widely in the law of the world as Krotoszynski, and very few who are capable of forming such confident and intelligent judgments." -James Whitman,Yale Law School, Krotoszynski's conclusions are revealing and forcefully presented. This is especially so when they are based on the author's sophisticated and copiously documented comparison of the U.S. with four advanced legal systems committed to participatory politics. The book undoubtedly challenges many of us who smugly accept American 'exceptionalism' in freedom of speech and the press. . . . Krotoszynski helps us appreciate the value of comparative free speech with a new, penetrating perspective., "Krotoszynski's conclusions are revealing and forcefully presented. This is especially so when they are based on the author's sophisticated and copiously documented comparison of the U.S. with four advanced legal systems committed to participatory politics. The book undoubtedly challenges many of us who smugly accept American 'exceptionalism' in freedom of speech and the press. . . . Krotoszynski helps us appreciate the value of comparative free speech with a new, penetrating perspective." - Law and Politics Book Review, Krotoszynskis conclusions are revealing and forcefully presented. This is especially so when they are based on the authors sophisticated and copiously documented comparison of the U.S. with four advanced legal systems committed to participatory politics. The book undoubtedly challenges many of us who smugly accept American & exceptionalism in freedom of speech and the press. . . . Krotoszynski helps us appreciate the value of comparative free speech with a new, penetrating perspective., "An important contribution in support of constitutional exceptionalism. . . . The great gift of Krotoszynski's book is to turn our attention to a knottier subject on which there is far less consensus." - Michigan Law Review ,, "The uniquely American sense of freedom that makes the First Amendment so beloved and so respected in its homeland is precisely what makes it a difficult model for constitutional protection of expression in other political systems. In this survey of free speech policies in Canada, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Krotosyznski introduces American students and scholars of constitutional law to a diverse range of culturally contingent approaches to protecting the freedom of expression in other industrialized countries. . . . As Krotosyznski's fascinating project demonstrates, comparative constitutional analysis challenges us as Americans to examine critically the cultural assumptions underlying our legal system." - Jim Chen, University of Minnesota Law School, "Suggests that First Amendment scholars might find it useful to consider how other nations, committed to democratic government, have sought to resolve the constant tension between protecting speech while also securing equality." - New York Law Journal
Dewey Edition
22
Series Volume Number
77
Dewey Decimal
342.08/53
Edition Description
Annotated edition
Table Of Content
Acknowledgments Preface 1 Comparative Law, Free Speech, and the "Central Meaning" of the First Amendment 2 Freedom of Speech in the United States 3 Free Speech in Canada: Balancing Free Speech and a Commitment to Communitarian Values 4 Free Speech in Germany: Militant Democracy and the Primacy of Dignity as a Preferred Constitutional Value 5 Freedom of Speech in Japan: Disentangling Culture,Community, and Freedom of Expression 6 Freedom of Expression in the United Kingdom: Free Speech and the Limits of a Written Constitution 7 Free Speech and the Culturally Contingent Nature of Human Rights: Some Concluding Observations Notes Index About the Author
Synopsis
Compares the First Amendment with free speech law in Japan, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom - countries that are all considered modern democracies, but have radically different understandings of what constitutes free speech., The First Amendment--and its guarantee of free speech for all Americans--has been at the center of scholarly and public debate since the birth of the Constitution, and the fervor in which intellectuals, politicians, and ordinary citizens approach the topic shows no sign of abating as the legal boundaries and definitions of free speech are continually evolving and facing new challenges. Such discussions have generally remained within the boundaries of the U.S. Constitution and its American context, but consideration of free speech in other industrial democracies can offer valuable insights into the relationship between free speech and democracy on a larger and more global scale, thereby shedding new light on some unexamined (and untested) assumptions that underlie U.S. free speech doctrine. Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., compares the First Amendment with free speech law in Japan, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom--countries that are all considered modern democracies but have radically different understandings of what constitutes free speech. Challenging the popular--and largely American--assertion that free speech is inherently necessary for democracy to thrive, Krotoszynski contends that it is very difficult to speak of free speech in universalist terms when the concept is examined from a framework of comparative law that takes cultural difference into full account., The First Amendment --and its guarantee of free speech for all Americans--has been at the center of scholarly and public debate since the birth of the Constitution, and the fervor in which intellectuals, politicians, and ordinary citizens approach the topic shows no sign of abating as the legal boundaries and definitions of free speech are continually evolving and facing new challenges. Such discussions have generally remained within the boundaries of the U.S. Constitution and its American context, but consideration of free speech in other industrial democracies can offer valuable insights into the relationship between free speech and democracy on a larger and more global scale, thereby shedding new light on some unexamined (and untested) assumptions that underlie U.S. free speech doctrine.Ronald Krotoszynski compares the First Amendment with free speech law in Japan, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom--countries that are all considered modern democracies but have radically different understandings of what constitutes free speech. Challenging the popular--and largely American--assertion that free speech is inherently necessary for democracy to thrive, Krotoszynski contends that it is very difficult to speak of free speech in universalist terms when the concept is examined from a framework of comparative law that takes cultural difference into full account., The uniquely American sense of freedom that makes the First Amendment so beloved and so respected in its homeland is precisely what makes it a difficult model for constitutional protection of expression in other political systems. In this survey of free speech policies in Canada, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Krotosyznski introduces American students and scholars of constitutional law to a diverse range of culturally contingent approaches to protecting the freedom of expression in other industrialized countries. . . . As Krotosyznskis fascinating project demonstrates, comparative constitutional analysis challenges us as Americans to examine critically the cultural assumptions underlying our legal system. --Jim Chen, University of Minnesota Law School"There are very few scholars who are willing to read as widely in the law of the world as Krotoszynski, and very few who are capable of forming such confident and intelligent judgments." --James Whitman, Yale Law School"For better or worse recent Supreme Court jurisprudence evidences a growing struggle over whether and, if so, how to address foreign court decisions. Ronald Krotoszynski's first-rate analysis of the comparative dimension of free speech issues could not be more timely. Not only does his work shed important light on free speech, but it informs as well." --Michael Heise, Cornell Law School"Krotoszynski has produced one of the best examples of the growing literature on comparative public law. His analysis of free speech law in four modern democracies is distinctive in that it goes beyond merely describing the rules governing expression in those countries to address the deeper differences incultural attitudes that explain the disparate legal outcomes. His sophisticated treatment of the intersecting lines of theory, doctrine, and culture makes this the most thorough and compelling assessment of comparative free speech law on the market today." --Steven G. Gey, David and Deborah Fonvielle & Donald and Janet Hinkle Professor of Law, Florida State University College of LawKrotoszynskis conclusions are revealing and forcefully presented. This is especially so when they are based on the authors sophisticated and copiously documented comparison of the US with four advanced legal systems committed to participatory politics. The book undoubtedly challenges many of us who smugly accept American exceptionalism in freedom of speech and the press...Krotoszynski helps us appreciate the value of comparative free speech with a new, penetrating perspective. --"The Law and Politics Book Review"The First Amendment --and its guarantee of free speech for all Americans--has been at the center of scholarly and public debate since the birth of the Constitution, and the fervor in which intellectuals, politicians, and ordinary citizens approach the topic shows no sign of abating as the legal boundaries and definitions of free speech are continually evolving and facing new challenges. Such discussions have generally remained within the boundaries of the U.S. Constitution and its American context, but consideration of free speech in other industrial democracies can offer valuable insights into the relationship between free speech and democracy on a larger and more global scale, thereby shedding new light on some unexamined (and untested) assumptions that underlie U.S. free speechdoctrine.Ronald Krotoszynski compares the First Amendment with free speech law in Japan, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom--countries that are all considered modern democracies but have radically different understandings of what constitutes free speech. Challenging the popular--and largely American--assertion that free speech is inherently necessary for democracy to thrive, Krotoszynski contends that it is very difficult to speak of free speech in universalist terms when the concept is examined from a framework of comparative law that takes cultural difference into full a
LC Classification Number
K3254.K76 2006

Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers

Info zu diesem Verkäufer

2ndChapter Treasures

100% positive Bewertungen•5.9 Tsd. Artikel verkauft

Mitglied seit Okt 2002
Antwortet meist innerhalb 24 Stunden
Angemeldet als privater VerkäuferDaher finden verbraucherschützende Vorschriften, die sich aus dem EU-Verbraucherrecht ergeben, keine Anwendung. Der eBay-Käuferschutz gilt dennoch für die meisten Käufe.
Welcome to 2ndChapter Treasures, a top-rated, family-owned small business proudly run by a U.S. Air Force Veteran and his wife. We are passionate about giving Books, CDs, DVDs, Magazines and more a ...
Mehr anzeigen
Shop besuchenKontakt

Detaillierte Verkäuferbewertungen

Durchschnitt in den letzten 12 Monaten
Genaue Beschreibung
5.0
Angemessene Versandkosten
4.9
Lieferzeit
5.0
Kommunikation
5.0

Verkäuferbewertungen (1'922)

Alle Bewertungen
Positiv
Neutral
Negativ
Alle Bewertungen ansehen

Noch mehr entdecken: