|Eingestellt in Kategorie:
Dieses Angebot wurde verkauft am So, 29. Jun um 07:35.
Der Geist der Verfassung: John Marshall und die 200-jährige Odyssee des McCull
Verkauft
Der Geist der Verfassung: John Marshall und die 200-jährige Odyssee des McCull
US $8,26US $8,26
So, 29. Jun, 19:35So, 29. Jun, 19:35
Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?

Der Geist der Verfassung: John Marshall und die 200-jährige Odyssee des McCull

Snowrider Books
(7381)
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
US $8,26
Ca.CHF 6,62
Artikelzustand:
Sehr gut
Hardcover book with dustjacket. Light wear to dust jacket and to pages.
    Versand:
    Kostenlos Economy Shipping.
    Standort: Georgetown, Colorado, USA
    Lieferung:
    Lieferung zwischen Sa, 19. Jul und Do, 24. Jul nach 94104 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
    Wir wenden ein spezielles Verfahren zur Einschätzung des Liefertermins an – in diese Schätzung fließen Faktoren wie die Entfernung des Käufers zum Artikelstandort, der gewählte Versandservice, die bisher versandten Artikel des Verkäufers und weitere ein. Insbesondere während saisonaler Spitzenzeiten können die Lieferzeiten abweichen.
    Rücknahme:
    30 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Wenn Sie ein eBay-Versandetikett verwenden, werden die Kosten dafür von Ihrer Rückerstattung abgezogen.
    Zahlungen:
         Diners Club

    Sicher einkaufen

    eBay-Käuferschutz
    Geld zurück, wenn etwas mit diesem Artikel nicht stimmt. Mehr erfahreneBay-Käuferschutz - wird in neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet
    Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
    eBay-Artikelnr.:186860497013
    Zuletzt aktualisiert am 19. Jun. 2025 02:04:34 MESZAlle Änderungen ansehenAlle Änderungen ansehen

    Artikelmerkmale

    Artikelzustand
    Sehr gut
    Buch, das nicht neu aussieht und gelesen wurde, sich aber in einem hervorragenden Zustand befindet. Der Einband weist keine offensichtlichen Beschädigungen auf. Bei gebundenen Büchern ist der Schutzumschlag vorhanden (sofern zutreffend). Alle Seiten sind vollständig vorhanden, es gibt keine zerknitterten oder eingerissenen Seiten und im Text oder im Randbereich wurden keine Unterstreichungen, Markierungen oder Notizen vorgenommen. Der Inneneinband kann minimale Gebrauchsspuren aufweisen. Minimale Gebrauchsspuren. Genauere Einzelheiten sowie eine Beschreibung eventueller Mängel entnehmen Sie bitte dem Angebot des Verkäufers. Alle Zustandsdefinitionen ansehenwird in neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet
    Hinweise des Verkäufers
    “Hardcover book with dustjacket. Light wear to dust jacket and to pages.”
    ISBN
    9780190699482

    Über dieses Produkt

    Product Identifiers

    Publisher
    Oxford University Press, Incorporated
    ISBN-10
    0190699485
    ISBN-13
    9780190699482
    eBay Product ID (ePID)
    25038249639

    Product Key Features

    Number of Pages
    344 Pages
    Language
    English
    Publication Name
    Spirit of the Constitution : John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of Mcculloch V. Maryland
    Subject
    Constitutional, Government / General, Lawyers & Judges, United States / General
    Publication Year
    2019
    Type
    Textbook
    Subject Area
    Law, Biography & Autobiography, History
    Author
    David S. Schwartz
    Format
    Hardcover

    Dimensions

    Item Height
    1.3 in
    Item Weight
    21.6 Oz
    Item Length
    6.1 in
    Item Width
    9.3 in

    Additional Product Features

    Intended Audience
    Scholarly & Professional
    LCCN
    2019-004959
    Reviews
    "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance"With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshall do?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019"Professor Schwartz brilliantly shows that courts and scholars have gotten Chief Justice Marshall's famous opinion in McCulloch v Maryland wrong and misunderstood its role in the Court's history. This remarkable work of history is a must-read for anyone interested in constitutional law because Schwartz's findings should have profound consequences for Supreme Court decisionmaking in areas ranging from health care to federalism to civil rights. This is a major contribution."--William M. Treanor, Paul Dean Professor and Dean and Executive Vice President, Georgetown University Law Center"Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of the impact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formal law."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School, "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance "With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshall do?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019 "Professor Schwartz brilliantly shows that courts and scholars have gotten Chief Justice Marshall's famous opinion in McCulloch v Maryland wrong and misunderstood its role in the Court's history. This remarkable work of history is a must-read for anyone interested in constitutional law because Schwartz's findings should have profound consequences for Supreme Court decisionmaking in areas ranging from health care to federalism to civil rights. This is a major contribution."--William M. Treanor, Paul Dean Professor and Dean and Executive Vice President, Georgetown University Law Center "Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of the impact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formal law."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School, "With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshall do?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019 "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance "Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of the impact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formal law."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School, "David Schwartz has written an indispensable study of the single most important Supreme Court case in the canon. As such, he delineates not only the meaning and importance of the case in 1819, but also the use made of it over the next two centuries as it became a central myth and symbol of the very meaning of American constitutionalism."--Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance"With compelling clarity, David Schwartz uses the many re-interpretations of McCulloch v. Maryland to illuminate the whole arc of American constitutional development, and draws a surprising but vital conclusion: it is wiser to look to the precedents set by elected legislative and executive officials, as well as our current needs, to decide what our constitutional system requires to fulfill its great goals-rather than asking 'what would John Marshalldo?'"--Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania and President, American Political Science Association, 2018-2019"Professor Schwartz brilliantly shows that courts and scholars have gotten Chief Justice Marshall's famous opinion in McCulloch v Maryland wrong and misunderstood its role in the Court's history. This remarkable work of history is a must-read for anyone interested in constitutional law because Schwartz's findings should have profound consequences for Supreme Court decisionmaking in areas ranging from health care to federalism to civil rights. This is amajor contribution."--William M. Treanor, Paul Dean Professor and Dean and Executive Vice President, Georgetown University Law Center"Professor Schwartz's book challenges the thinking of those who believe that the towering Marshall Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland stands for legal principles that are clear and specific. It carefully explores the ambiguities in the Court's opinion and, in the process, illuminates some of the most fundamental problems-too often slighted or denied-of American constitutionalism. It is particularly valuable in its convincing demonstration of theimpact that slavery had on the development of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, especially when that influence was not immediately apparent in the cases and often neither acknowledged nor recognized by the formallaw."--Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School
    TitleLeading
    The
    Dewey Edition
    23
    Illustrated
    Yes
    Dewey Decimal
    342.73052
    Table Of Content
    Introduction: "The Letter and Spirit of the Constitution"Part I: Defensive NationalismChapter 1: "The Case Now to be Determined": the Elusive Meaning of McCulloch v. MarylandChapter 2: "A Question Perpetually Arising": Constitutional Politics and Law, circa 1819Chapter 3: "Has Congress Power to Incorporate a Bank?": the McCulloch Oral Argument and OpinionChapter 4: "As Far as Human Prudence Could Insure": The Retreat from Implied PowersPart II: Disappearance and RevivalChapter 5: "The Baneful Influence of this Narrow Construction": McCulloch in the Age of Jackson, 1832-1860Chapter 6: "The Various Crises of Human Affairs": McCulloch and the Civil War Chapter 7: "The Government of All": the Rise and Fall of Reconstruction, 1865-1883 Chapter 8: "Acting Directly on the People": Neo-Whig Nationalism, 1868-1888 Chapter 9: "The Painful Duty of this Tribunal": The Emergence of Judicial Supremacy, 1884-1901 Part III: The Canonical CaseChapter 10: "Some Choice of Means": The Lochner Era and ProgressivismChapter 11: "Withholding the Most Appropriate Means": The New Deal and Judicial Crisis, 1932-1936Chapter 12: "It is a Constitution We Are Expounding": the Triumph of the Capable Constitution, 1937-1968Chapter 13: "A Splendid Bauble": McCulloch in the Long Conservative Court, 1969-2018Conclusion: "As Long as Our System Shall Exist"
    Synopsis
    2019 marks the 200th anniversary of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history: McCulloch v. Maryland . The state of Maryland tried to impede the establishment of the Bank of the United States, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided that the Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution gave the federal government implied powers that allowed it to charter the bank without hindrance. The decision expanded the power of the national government vis- -vis the states, and it still figures centrally in contemporary debates about the scope of national legislative power. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act relied on it. In The Spirit of the Constitution , David S. Schwartz tells the story of the decision's long-term impact and the evolution of Justice Marshall's reputation. By tracing the rich history of McCulloch 's influence from 1819 to the present, he shows that its meaning-and significance-for judges, political leaders, and the public varied greatly over time. The case was alternately celebrated, denounced, ignored, and reinterpreted to suit the needs of the moment. While Marshall was never reviled, he was not seen as especially influential until the late nineteenth century. Competing parties utilized McCulloch in constitutional debates over national power in the early republic; over the question of slavery in the late antebellum period; and over Congress's role in regulating the economy and civil rights in the twentieth century. Even after McCulloch 's meaning seemed fixed by the mid-twentieth century, new debates about its implications have emerged in recent times. Schwartz's analysis of McCulloch 's remarkable impact reaffirms the case's importance and unveils the circuitous process through which American constitutional law and ideology are made., The Spirit of the Constitution covers the impact and reputation of both McCulloch and Justice Marshall himself throughout American history. One of the central threads of American history is the battle over the proper reach of the federal government's power, and that story cannot be told without reference to McCulloch. Schwartz's analysis of the shifting interpretations of McCulloch and Marshall over the course of American history not only reaffirms the case's importance, it also helps us understand the circuitous process by which American constitutional law and ideology are made., 2019 marks the 200th anniversary of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history: McCulloch v. Maryland. The state of Maryland tried to impede the establishment of the Bank of the United States, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided that the Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution gave the federal government implied powers that allowed it to charter the bank without hindrance. The decision expanded the power of the national government vis-à-vis the states, and it still figures in contemporary debates about the scope of national legislative power. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act relied on it.In The Spirit of the Constitution, David S. Schwartz tells the story of the decision's long-term impact and the evolution of Justice Marshall's reputation. By tracing the rich history of McCulloch's influence from 1819 to the present, he shows that its meaning and significance for judges, political leaders, and the public varied greatly over time. The case was alternately celebrated, denounced, ignored, and reinterpreted to suit the needs of the moment. While Marshall was never reviled, he was not seen as especially influential until the late nineteenth century. Competing parties utilized McCulloch in constitutional debates over national power in the early republic; over the question of slavery in the late antebellum period; and over Congress's role in regulating the economy and civil rights in the twentieth century. Even after McCulloch's meaning seemed fixed by the mid-twentieth century, new debates about its implications have emerged in recent times. Schwartz's analysis of McCulloch's remarkable impact reaffirms the case's importance and unveils the circuitous process through which American constitutional law and ideology are made., 2019 marks the 200th anniversary of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in American history: McCulloch v. Maryland . The state of Maryland tried to impede the establishment of the Bank of the United States, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided that the Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution gave the federal government implied powers that allowed it to charter the bank without hindrance. The decision expanded the power of the national government vis-à-vis the states, and it still figures centrally in contemporary debates about the scope of national legislative power. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act relied on it. In The Spirit of the Constitution , David S. Schwartz tells the story of the decision's long-term impact and the evolution of Justice Marshall's reputation. By tracing the rich history of McCulloch 's influence from 1819 to the present, he shows that its meaning-and significance-for judges, political leaders, and the public varied greatly over time. The case was alternately celebrated, denounced, ignored, and reinterpreted to suit the needs of the moment. While Marshall was never reviled, he was not seen as especially influential until the late nineteenth century. Competing parties utilized McCulloch in constitutional debates over national power in the early republic; over the question of slavery in the late antebellum period; and over Congress's role in regulating the economy and civil rights in the twentieth century. Even after McCulloch 's meaning seemed fixed by the mid-twentieth century, new debates about its implications have emerged in recent times. Schwartz's analysis of McCulloch 's remarkable impact reaffirms the case's importance and unveils the circuitous process through which American constitutional law and ideology are made.
    LC Classification Number
    KF4565.S39 2019

    Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers

    Info zu diesem Verkäufer

    Snowrider Books

    98,6% positive Bewertungen24 Tsd. Artikel verkauft

    Mitglied seit Mai 2007
    Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
    Shop besuchenKontakt

    Detaillierte Verkäuferbewertungen

    Durchschnitt in den letzten 12 Monaten
    Genaue Beschreibung
    4.9
    Angemessene Versandkosten
    5.0
    Lieferzeit
    5.0
    Kommunikation
    4.9

    Verkäuferbewertungen (7'127)

    Alle Bewertungen
    Positiv
    Neutral
    Negativ
      • s***a (771)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
        Letzter Monat
        Bestätigter Kauf
        Good
      Alle Bewertungen ansehen