Bild 1 von 1
Galerie
Bild 1 von 1
Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?
Die Grenzen des offenen Geistes von Jeremy Fantl: Gebraucht
US $134,81
Ca.CHF 108,76
Artikelzustand:
Gut
Buch, das gelesen wurde, sich aber in einem guten Zustand befindet. Der Einband weist nur sehr geringfügige Beschädigungen auf, wie z.B. kleinere Schrammen, er hat aber weder Löcher, noch ist er eingerissen. Bei gebundenen Büchern ist der Schutzumschlag möglicherweise nicht mehr vorhanden. Die Bindung weist geringfügige Gebrauchsspuren auf. Die Mehrzahl der Seiten ist unbeschädigt, das heißt, es gibt kaum Knitter oder Einrisse, es wurden nur in geringem Maße Bleistiftunterstreichungen im Text vorgenommen, es gibt keine Textmarkierungen und die Randbereiche sind nicht beschrieben. Alle Seiten sind vollständig vorhanden. Genauere Einzelheiten sowie eine Beschreibung eventueller Mängel entnehmen Sie bitte dem Angebot des Verkäufers.
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Versand:
Kostenlos Standard Shipping.
Standort: Sparks, Nevada, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Do, 21. Aug und Di, 26. Aug bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Rücknahme:
30 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Wenn Sie ein eBay-Versandetikett verwenden, werden die Kosten dafür von Ihrer Rückerstattung abgezogen.
Zahlungen:
Sicher einkaufen
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:285952945130
Artikelmerkmale
- Artikelzustand
- Book Title
- The Limitations of the Open Mind
- Publication Date
- 2018-06-05
- ISBN
- 9780198807957
Über dieses Produkt
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0198807953
ISBN-13
9780198807957
eBay Product ID (ePID)
242671450
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
256 Pages
Publication Name
Limitations of the Open Mind
Language
English
Subject
General
Publication Year
2018
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Philosophy
Format
Hardcover
Dimensions
Item Height
0.8 in
Item Weight
19.1 Oz
Item Length
9.5 in
Item Width
6.4 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
2017-959352
TitleLeading
The
Dewey Edition
23
Reviews
an excellent book about the epistemology and ethics of engagement in argumentation ... Highly recommended., "an excellent book about the epistemology and ethics of engagement in argumentation ... Highly recommended." -- N. D. Smith, CHOICE
Dewey Decimal
168
Table Of Content
Part I: The Epistemology of Open-Mindedness1. Open-Mindedness2. A Defense of (a different kind of) Dogmatism3. The Epistemic Efficacy of Amateurism4. Psychic Phenomena and the Existence of GodPart II: The Ethics of Participation in Argumentation5. The Obligation to Engage6. Against Open-Minded Engagement (for Some People)7. Against Closed-Minded Engagement (in Some Situations)8. On Inviting Problematic Speakers to Campus
Synopsis
When we should engage with those we disagree with? Jeremy Fantl argues that sometimes we can know that arguments for controversial ideas go wrong even without engaging critically with them or figuring out where they err. Sometimes we shouldn't engage critically with an argument and, if we do engage, we shouldn't engage open-mindedly., When should you engage with difficult arguments against your cherished controversial beliefs? The primary conclusion of this book is that your obligations to engage with counterarguments are more limited than is often thought. In some standard situations, you shouldn't engage with difficult counterarguments and, if you do, you shouldn't engage with them open-mindedly. This conclusion runs counter to aspects of the Millian political tradition and political liberalism, as well as what people working in informal logic tend to say about argumentation. Not all misleading arguments wear their flaws on their sleeve. Each step of a misleading argument might seem compelling and you might not be able to figure out what's wrong with it. Still, even if you can't figure out what's wrong with an argument, you can know that it's misleading. One way to know that an argument is misleading is, counterintuitively, to lack expertise in the methods and evidence-types employed by the argument. When you know that a counterargument is misleading, you shouldn't engage with it open-mindedly and sometimes shouldn't engage with it at all. You shouldn't engage open-mindedly because you shouldn't be willing to reduce your confidence in response to arguments you know are misleading. And you sometimes shouldn't engage closed-mindedly, because to do so can be manipulative or ineffective. In making this case, Jeremy Fantl discusses echo chambers and group polarization, the importance in academic writing of a sympathetic case for the opposition, the epistemology of disagreement, the account of open-mindedness, and invitations to problematic academic speakers., When should you engage with difficult arguments against your cherished controversial beliefs? The primary conclusion of this book is that your obligations to engage with counterarguments are more limited than is often thought. In some standard situations, you shouldn't engage with difficult counterarguments and, if you do, you shouldn't engage with them open-mindedly. This conclusion runs counter to aspects of the Millian political tradition and political liberalism, as well as what people working in informal logic tend to say about argumentation.Not all misleading arguments wear their flaws on their sleeve. Each step of a misleading argument might seem compelling and you might not be able to figure out what's wrong with it. Still, even if you can't figure out what's wrong with an argument, you can know that it's misleading. One way to know that an argument is misleading is, counterintuitively, to lack expertise in the methods and evidence-types employed by the argument. When you know that a counterargument is misleading, you shouldn't engage with it open-mindedly and sometimes shouldn't engage with it at all. You shouldn't engage open-mindedly because you shouldn't be willing to reduce your confidence in response to arguments you know are misleading. And you sometimes shouldn't engage closed-mindedly, because to do so can be manipulative or ineffective.In making this case, Jeremy Fantl discusses echo chambers and group polarization, the importance in academic writing of a sympathetic case for the opposition, the epistemology of disagreement, the account of open-mindedness, and invitations to problematic academic speakers.
LC Classification Number
BC177
Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers
Info zu diesem Verkäufer
AlibrisBooks
98,6% positive Bewertungen•1.9 Mio. Artikel verkauft
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
Verkäuferbewertungen (515'399)
- k***d (442)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufAwesome, thanks!
- i***i (397)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufThank you for packing books well. Book arrived in great condition!
- i***i (397)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufPackaged well. Book is in great condition. Thank you
Noch mehr entdecken:
- Bücher über Geisten Sachbuch,
- Deutsche Bücher über Geisten Sachbuch,
- Bücher im Taschenbuch Sachbuch Geisten,
- Bücher über Geisten Sachbuch als gebundene Ausgabe,
- Bücher über Geisten Sachbuch Ab 2010,
- Gesundheit-, - Ernährung- & - Medizin-Sachbuch Geisten Bücher,
- Lebensführung-, - Motivation- & - Karriere-Sachbuch Geisten Bücher
AlibrisBooks
98,6% positive Bewertungen•1.9 Mio. Artikel verkauft
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
Verkäuferbewertungen (515'399)
- k***d (442)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufAwesome, thanks!
- i***i (397)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufThank you for packing books well. Book arrived in great condition!
- i***i (397)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufPackaged well. Book is in great condition. Thank you