Bild 1 von 1

Galerie
Bild 1 von 1

Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?
Anthropology & Historiography Of Science: Continental Thought Series, V16 (Volum
US $12,94
Ca.CHF 10,30
oder Preisvorschlag
Artikelzustand:
“Very Good - Crisp, clean, unread book with some shelfwear/edgewear, may have a remainder mark - NICE ”... Mehr erfahrenÜber den Artikelzustand
Sehr gut
Buch, das nicht neu aussieht und gelesen wurde, sich aber in einem hervorragenden Zustand befindet. Der Einband weist keine offensichtlichen Beschädigungen auf. Bei gebundenen Büchern ist der Schutzumschlag vorhanden (sofern zutreffend). Alle Seiten sind vollständig vorhanden, es gibt keine zerknitterten oder eingerissenen Seiten und im Text oder im Randbereich wurden keine Unterstreichungen, Markierungen oder Notizen vorgenommen. Der Inneneinband kann minimale Gebrauchsspuren aufweisen. Minimale Gebrauchsspuren. Genauere Einzelheiten sowie eine Beschreibung eventueller Mängel entnehmen Sie bitte dem Angebot des Verkäufers.
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Versand:
Kostenlos Economy Shipping.
Standort: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Do, 9. Okt und Di, 14. Okt nach 94104 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Rücknahme:
30 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Wenn Sie ein eBay-Versandetikett verwenden, werden die Kosten dafür von Ihrer Rückerstattung abgezogen.
Zahlungen:
Sicher einkaufen
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:354352650317
Artikelmerkmale
- Artikelzustand
- Sehr gut
- Hinweise des Verkäufers
- ISBN
- 9780821409527
Über dieses Produkt
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Ohio University Press
ISBN-10
0821409522
ISBN-13
9780821409527
eBay Product ID (ePID)
396200
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
300 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Anthropology and Historiography of Science
Subject
General, Anthropology / General
Publication Year
1990
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Philosophy, Social Science
Series
Series in Continental Thought Ser.
Format
Hardcover
Dimensions
Item Height
0.6 in
Item Weight
23.5 Oz
Item Length
9.8 in
Item Width
5.9 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
89-026582
Reviews
"A pleasure to read ... full of the author's obvious intellect and genuine depth of understanding and interest in the subjects concerned, without a hint of partisan apologetics.... This is an intelligent balanced and deeply satisfying book."--John Laurent, A pleasure to read ... full of the author's obvious intellect and genuine depth of understanding and interest in the subjects concerned, without a hint of partisan apologetics.... This is an intelligent balanced and deeply satisfying book.
Series Volume Number
16
Volume Number
Vol. 16
Synopsis
Whether history or anthropology is the most fundamental social science remains still a controversial and undecided issue. For a proper understanding of this instructive controversy, the presuppositions of these two disciplines need to be critically and philosophically reviewed. Otherwise the true perspective of the controversy remains undisclosed and therefore unintelligible. A close and comprehensive understanding of language as the basic form of the life-world provides the cues necessary to show correctly the complementary relation between anthropology and history. That synchronic or sociological and diachronic or historical perspectives of science are mutually supportive ways of representing the same social activities has been persuasively argued in this book. Chattopadhyaya has pointedly examined in this connection the conflicting views of Sartre and Levi-Strauss. Also, he has selectively drawn upon, critically assessed, and brought the theories of Husserl, Heidegger, Popper, Quine, and Kuhn to bear upon the problem. The author's conclusion centers around his own concept of human universals . The positive thesis of the book rejects the trichotomy of three cultures: scientific, humanistic, and technological. That this view is not a theoretical creature but a historical and cultural finding has been plausibly reasoned by Chattopadhyaya. The main trend of his reasoning clearly shows that the gulf between analytic philosophers and phenomenologists is either imaginary or highly exaggerated. In this specific case, the author, a student of Popper, perceptively aruges to the effect that if theorizations is primarily problem-oriented rather than "school-based," one can see one's way to rational solution in the convergent light of different but affine human or cultural origins. But his presentation and assessment of the views and arguments of Husseri, Popper, Quine and Kuhn are likely to prove controversial., Whether history or anthropology is the most fundamental social science remains still a controversial and undecided issue. For a proper understanding of this instructive controversy, the presuppositions of these two disciplines need to be critically and philosophically reviewed. Otherwise the true perspective of the controversy remains undisclosed and therefore unintelligible. A close and comprehensive understanding of language as the basic form of the life-world provides the cues necessary to show correctly the complementary relation between anthropology and history. That synchronic or sociological and diachronic or historical perspectives of science are mutually supportive ways of representing the same social activities has been persuasively argued in this book. Chattopadhyaya has pointedly examined in this connection the conflicting views of Sartre and Levi-Strauss. Also, he has selectively drawn upon, critically assessed, and brought the theories of Husserl, Heidegger, Popper, Quine, and Kuhn to bear upon the problem. The author s conclusion centers around his own concept of "human universals." The positive thesis of the book rejects the trichotomy of three cultures: scientific, humanistic, and technological. That this view is not a theoretical creature but a historical and cultural finding has been plausibly reasoned by Chattopadhyaya. The main trend of his reasoning clearly shows that the gulf between analytic philosophers and phenomenologists is either imaginary or highly exaggerated. In this specific case, the author, a student of Popper, perceptively aruges to the effect that if theorizations is primarily problem-oriented rather than school-based, one can see one s way to rational solution in the convergent light of different but affine human or cultural origins. But his presentation and assessment of the views and arguments of Husseri, Popper, Quine and Kuhn are likely to prove controversial.", Whether history or anthropology is the most fundamental social science remains still a controversial and undecided issue. For a proper understanding of this instructive controversy, the presuppositions of these two disciplines need to be critically and philosophically reviewed. Otherwise the true perspective of the controversy remains undisclosed and therefore unintelligible. A close and comprehensive understanding of language as the basic form of the life-world provides the cues necessary to show correctly the complementary relation between anthropology and history. That synchronic or sociological and diachronic or historical perspectives of science are mutually supportive ways of representing the same social activities has been persuasively argued in this book. Chattopadhyaya has pointedly examined in this connection the conflicting views of Sartre and Levi-Strauss. Also, he has selectively drawn upon, critically assessed, and brought the theories of Husserl, Heidegger, Popper, Quine, and Kuhn to bear upon the problem. The author's conclusion centers around his own concept of human universals. The positive thesis of the book rejects the trichotomy of three cultures: scientific, humanistic, and technological. That this view is not a theoretical creature but a historical and cultural finding has been plausibly reasoned by Chattopadhyaya. The main trend of his reasoning clearly shows that the gulf between analytic philosophers and phenomenologists is either imaginary or highly exaggerated. In this specific case, the author, a student of Popper, perceptively aruges to the effect that if theorizations is primarily problem-oriented rather than "school-based," one can see one's way to rational solution in the convergent light of different but affine human or cultural origins. But his presentation and assessment of the views and arguments of Husseri, Popper, Quine and Kuhn are likely to prove controversial., Whether history or anthropology is the most fundamental social science remains still a controversial and undecided issue. For a proper understanding of this instructive controversy, the presuppositions of these two disciplines need to be critically and philosophically reviewed.
LC Classification Number
B67.C44 1990
Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers
Info zu diesem Verkäufer
Midtown Scholar Bookstore
99,9% positive Bewertungen•571 Tsd. Artikel verkauft
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
Beliebte Kategorien in diesem Shop
Verkäuferbewertungen (206'759)
- Automatische Bewertung von eBay- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestellung pünktlich und problemlos geliefert
- Automatische Bewertung von eBay- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestellung pünktlich und problemlos geliefert
- Automatische Bewertung von eBay- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestellung pünktlich und problemlos geliefert
Noch mehr entdecken:
- Science-Fiction-Belletristik Romane,
- Science-Fiction-Belletristik-Jugendliche Romane,
- Science-Fiction-Belletristik-Bücher auf Deutsch,
- Bücher über Literatur Science-Fiction-Belletristik,
- Romane & Erzählungen für Kinder & Jugendliche Science-Fiction,
- Isaac-Asimov-Science-Fiction - Belletristik-Bücher,
- Englische Science-Fiction-Belletristik-Bücher,
- Science-Fiction-Belletristik-Jugendliche Bücher auf Deutsch,
- Romane & Erzählungen für Kinder & Jugendliche Jugendliche Science-Fiction,
- Star Wars Science-Fiction-Bücher mit Belletristik-Genre