Bild 1 von 1

Galerie
Bild 1 von 1

Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?
The Popper-Carnap Controversy
US $18,66
Ca.CHF 14,95
Artikelzustand:
Gut
Buch, das gelesen wurde, sich aber in einem guten Zustand befindet. Der Einband weist nur sehr geringfügige Beschädigungen auf, wie z.B. kleinere Schrammen, er hat aber weder Löcher, noch ist er eingerissen. Bei gebundenen Büchern ist der Schutzumschlag möglicherweise nicht mehr vorhanden. Die Bindung weist geringfügige Gebrauchsspuren auf. Die Mehrzahl der Seiten ist unbeschädigt, das heißt, es gibt kaum Knitter oder Einrisse, es wurden nur in geringem Maße Bleistiftunterstreichungen im Text vorgenommen, es gibt keine Textmarkierungen und die Randbereiche sind nicht beschrieben. Alle Seiten sind vollständig vorhanden. Genauere Einzelheiten sowie eine Beschreibung eventueller Mängel entnehmen Sie bitte dem Angebot des Verkäufers.
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Versand:
Kostenlos Standard Shipping.
Standort: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Mi, 23. Jul und Fr, 25. Jul nach 94104 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Rücknahme:
30 Tage Rückgabe. Verkäufer zahlt Rückversand.
Zahlungen:
Sicher einkaufen
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:388014159771
Artikelmerkmale
- Artikelzustand
- Artist
- Michalos, Alex C.
- Book Title
- The Popper-Carnap Controversy
- ISBN
- 9789024751273
Über dieses Produkt
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
ISBN-10
9024751276
ISBN-13
9789024751273
eBay Product ID (ePID)
662659
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
Xi, 124 Pages
Publication Name
Popper-Carnap Controversy
Language
English
Publication Year
1971
Subject
Philosophy & Social Aspects, Individual Philosophers, General
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Philosophy, Science
Format
Trade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Weight
16.2 Oz
Item Length
9.4 in
Item Width
6.3 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
70-873619
Number of Volumes
1 vol.
Illustrated
Yes
Table Of Content
I: Introduction.- II: Acceptability and Logical Improbability.- III: Two Explicanda and Three Arguments.- IV: Bar-Hillel's "Comments" and Unrestricted Universals.- V: Instance and Qualified-Instance Confirmation.- VI: The Singular Predictive Inference.- VII: Lakatos on Appraisal, Growth and Analytic Guides.- VIII: Hintikka and Hilpinen on Inductive Generalzation.- IX: Cost-Benefit Versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules.- List of Reference.
Synopsis
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen- bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad- miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention., 1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention., 1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen- bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad- miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention.
LC Classification Number
Q174-175.3
Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers
Info zu diesem Verkäufer
Redux Books
99,5% positive Bewertungen•22 Tsd. Artikel verkauft
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
Verkäuferbewertungen (7'118)
- 7***o (327)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufFast delivery. Brand New. Great price. THANKS
- d***a (165)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter Kaufproduct as described. fast shipping
- o***t (25)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufFast Shipment. Item arrived as advertised. Would order from seller again!
Noch mehr entdecken:
- The Face Zeitschriften,
- The Culinary Chronicle Kochbücher,
- Frederick-the-Great-Belletristik - Bücher,
- Frederick-the-Great-Sachbuch Bücher,
- The Walking Dead Belletristik-Bücher,
- Erwachsene Masters of the Universe Hörbücher und Hörspiele,
- Robert-Kirkman-The-Walking - Dead-Belletristik-Bücher,
- Masters of the Universe Buchreihe Hörbücher und Hörspiele auf Deutsch,
- Masters of the Universe Jugendliche Hörbücher und Hörspiele auf Deutsch,
- Hörbücher und Hörspiele Masters of the Universe Buchreihe Deutsche Kassette