|Eingestellt in Kategorie:
Dieses Angebot wurde verkauft am Mo, 9. Jun um 02:42.
Battle of Stones River: The Forgotten Conflict between the Confederate Army ...
Verkauft
Battle of Stones River: The Forgotten Conflict between the Confederate Army ...
US $20,82US $20,82
Di, 10. Jun, 02:42Di, 10. Jun, 02:42
Ähnlichen Artikel verkaufen?

Battle of Stones River: The Forgotten Conflict between the Confederate Army ...

RNA TRADE
(6924)
Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
US $20,82
Ca.CHF 16,56
Artikelzustand:
Gut
    Versand:
    Kostenlos USPS Media MailTM.
    Standort: Buford, Georgia, USA
    Lieferung:
    Lieferung zwischen Do, 31. Jul und Di, 5. Aug nach 91768 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
    Wir wenden ein spezielles Verfahren zur Einschätzung des Liefertermins an – in diese Schätzung fließen Faktoren wie die Entfernung des Käufers zum Artikelstandort, der gewählte Versandservice, die bisher versandten Artikel des Verkäufers und weitere ein. Insbesondere während saisonaler Spitzenzeiten können die Lieferzeiten abweichen.
    Rücknahme:
    30 Tage Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Wenn Sie ein eBay-Versandetikett verwenden, werden die Kosten dafür von Ihrer Rückerstattung abgezogen.
    Zahlungen:
         Diners Club

    Sicher einkaufen

    eBay-Käuferschutz
    Geld zurück, wenn etwas mit diesem Artikel nicht stimmt. Mehr erfahreneBay-Käuferschutz - wird in neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet
    Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
    eBay-Artikelnr.:396553611063
    Zuletzt aktualisiert am 09. Jun. 2025 23:31:48 MESZAlle Änderungen ansehenAlle Änderungen ansehen

    Artikelmerkmale

    Artikelzustand
    Gut: Buch, das gelesen wurde, sich aber in einem guten Zustand befindet. Der Einband weist nur sehr ...
    Release Year
    2012
    ISBN
    9780807145166

    Über dieses Produkt

    Product Identifiers

    Publisher
    LSU Press
    ISBN-10
    0807145165
    ISBN-13
    9780807145166
    eBay Product ID (ePID)
    117282782

    Product Key Features

    Book Title
    Battle of Stones River : The Forgotten Conflict Between the Confederate Army of Tennessee and the Union Army of the Cumberland
    Number of Pages
    344 Pages
    Language
    English
    Topic
    United States / State & Local / South (Al, Ar, Fl, Ga, Ky, La, ms, Nc, SC, Tn, VA, WV), United States / Civil War Period (1850-1877)
    Publication Year
    2012
    Illustrator
    Yes
    Genre
    History
    Author
    Larry J. Daniel
    Format
    Hardcover

    Dimensions

    Item Height
    0.9 in
    Item Weight
    12.3 Oz
    Item Length
    9 in
    Item Width
    6 in

    Additional Product Features

    Intended Audience
    Trade
    LCCN
    2012-000886
    Dewey Edition
    23
    Dewey Decimal
    973.7/3
    Synopsis
    Three days of savage and bloody fighting between Confederate and Union troops at Stones River in Middle Tennessee ended with nearly 25,000 casualties but no clear victor. The staggering number of killed or wounded equaled the losses suffered in the well-known Battle of Shiloh. Using previously neglected sources, Larry J. Daniel rescues this important campaign from obscurity. The Battle of Stones River, fought between December 31, 1862, and January 2, 1863, was a tactical draw but proved to be a strategic northern victory. According to Daniel, Union defeats in late 1862 -- both at Chickasaw Bayou in Mississippi and at Fredericksburg, Virginia -- transformed the clash in Tennessee into a much-needed morale booster for the North. Daniel's study of the battle's two antagonists, William S. Rosecrans for the Union Army of the Cumberland and Braxton Bragg for the Confederate Army of Tennessee, presents contrasts in leadership and a series of missteps. Union soldiers liked Rosecrans's personable nature, whereas Bragg acquired a reputation as antisocial and suspicious. Rosecrans had won his previous battle at Corinth, and Bragg had failed at the recent Kentucky Campaign. But despite Rosecrans's apparent advantage, both commanders made serious mistakes. With only a few hundred yards separating the lines, Rosecrans allowed Confederates to surprise and route his right ring. Eventually, Union pressure forced Bragg to launch a division-size attack, a disastrous move. Neither side could claim victory on the battlefield. In the aftermath of the bloody conflict, Union commanders and northern newspapers portrayed the stalemate as a victory, bolstering confidence in the Lincoln administration and dimming the prospects for the "peace wing" of the northern Democratic Party. In the South, the deadlock led to continued bickering in the Confederate western high command and scorn for Braxton Bragg., Three days of savage and bloody fighting between Confederate and Union troops at Stones River in Middle Tennessee ended with nearly 25,000 casualties but no clear victor. The staggering number of killed or wounded equaled the losses suffered in the well-known Battle of Shiloh. Using previously neglected sources, Larry J. Daniel rescues this important campaign from obscurity. The Battle of Stones River, fought between December 31, 1862, and January 2, 1863, was a tactical draw but proved to be a strategic northern victory. According to Daniel, Union defeats in late 1862--both at Chickasaw Bayou in Mississippi and at Fredericksburg, Virginia--transformed the clash in Tennessee into a much-needed morale booster for the North. Daniel's study of the battle's two antagonists, William S. Rosecrans for the Union Army of the Cumberland and Braxton Bragg for the Confederate Army of Tennessee, presents contrasts in leadership and a series of missteps. Union soldiers liked Rosecrans's personable nature, whereas Bragg acquired a reputation as antisocial and suspicious. Rosecrans had won his previous battle at Corinth, and Bragg had failed at the recent Kentucky Campaign. But despite Rosecrans's apparent advantage, both commanders made serious mistakes. With only a few hundred yards separating the lines, Rosecrans allowed Confederates to surprise and route his right ring. Eventually, Union pressure forced Bragg to launch a division-size attack, a disastrous move. Neither side could claim victory on the battlefield. In the aftermath of the bloody conflict, Union commanders and northern newspapers portrayed the stalemate as a victory, bolstering confidence in the Lincoln administration and dimming the prospects for the "peace wing" of the northern Democratic Party. In the South, the deadlock led to continued bickering in the Confederate western high command and scorn for Braxton Bragg., Three days of savage and bloody fighting between Confederate and Union troops at Stones River in Middle Tennessee ended with nearly 25,000 casualties but no clear victor. The staggering number of killed or wounded equaled the losses suffered in the well-known Battle of Shiloh. Using previously neglected sources, Larry J. Daniel rescues this important campaign from obscurity. The Battle of Stones River, fought between December 31, 1862, and January 2, 1863, was a tactical draw but proved to be a strategic northern victory. According to Daniel, Union defeats in late 1862?both at Chickasaw Bayou in Mississippi and at Fredericksburg, Virginia?transformed the clash in Tennessee into a much-needed morale booster for the North. Daniel's study of the battle's two antagonists, William S. Rosecrans for the Union Army of the Cumberland and Braxton Bragg for the Confederate Army of Tennessee, presents contrasts in leadership and a series of missteps. Union soldiers liked Rosecrans's personable nature, whereas Bragg acquired a reputation as antisocial and suspicious. Rosecrans had won his previous battle at Corinth, and Bragg had failed at the recent Kentucky Campaign. But despite Rosecrans's apparent advantage, both commanders made serious mistakes. With only a few hundred yards separating the lines, Rosecrans allowed Confederates to surprise and route his right ring. Eventually, Union pressure forced Bragg to launch a division-size attack, a disastrous move. Neither side could claim victory on the battlefield. In the aftermath of the bloody conflict, Union commanders and northern newspapers portrayed the stalemate as a victory, bolstering confidence in the Lincoln administration and dimming the prospects for the "peace wing" of the northern Democratic Party. In the South, the deadlock led to continued bickering in the Confederate western high command and scorn for Braxton Bragg.
    LC Classification Number
    E474.77.D36 2012

    Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers

    Info zu diesem Verkäufer

    RNA TRADE

    99% positive Bewertungen32 Tsd. Artikel verkauft

    Mitglied seit Okt 2018
    Angemeldet als gewerblicher Verkäufer
    Best priced used items
    Shop besuchenKontakt

    Detaillierte Verkäuferbewertungen

    Durchschnitt in den letzten 12 Monaten
    Genaue Beschreibung
    4.9
    Angemessene Versandkosten
    5.0
    Lieferzeit
    5.0
    Kommunikation
    5.0

    Verkäuferbewertungen (7'344)

    Alle Bewertungen
    Positiv
    Neutral
    Negativ
      • e***e (209)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
        Letzter Monat
        Bestätigter Kauf
        Excellent condition and fast shipping
      Alle Bewertungen ansehen